Re: WYSIWYG Web Builder 8
RE: WYSIWYG Web Builder 8
I have known Pablo for a few years, not personally or in any way
associated with Pablo... but as a recommend-er, product reviewer and
discussing features for WYSIWYG Web Builder. And as a user, of course.
A pretty good product now/ At the start, appeared to be more of a
"NetObjects wanna-be sort of", but in the past two or so years, WYSIWYG
has really come into its own.
And, if it gives NOF a run for the money, well, that may be due as much
to Pablo's hard work, as it is Fusion's failures and "digital chuckholes
on the Information Highway" problems...
WYSIWYG Web Builder 8 sells for about $45 $US, and even at quite a bit
more if it was priced higher, it's well worth considering and using.
Joe
On 11/27/2011 1:02 PM, Peter wrote:
> who stands behind wysywygwebbuilder? can those, who make PR for this
> product, give us some information?
>
> look, what can be found on the Web.
>
> "http://www.wysiwygwebbuilder.de/support.html
> Not Found
> The requested URL /support.html was not found on this server.
> Apache/2.2.9 (Debian) mod_python/3.3.1 Python/2.5.2 mod_ssl/2.2.9
> OpenSSL/0.9.8g Server at www.wysiwygwebbuilder.de Port 80"
>
> while the English version doesn't provide _any_ information on "who
> is?",
> the German version is totally offline:
> http://www.wysiwygwebbuilder.de/
>
> for as many as "in wenigen Tagen": several days! frightening.
>
> it seems, there's only one man behind this project: Götz Morgenschweis
> (Germany):
> http://www.goemo.de/Impressum.html
>
> here's an old capture from archive org from May 2011:
> http://tinyurl.com/7mzqddd
>
> there's another "company" or programmer mentioned and affiliated:
> http://pablosoftwaresolutions.com/
>
> instead of "who is" (deutsch: Impressum) it only states:
>
> "Thanks for visiting my website!
> Pablo"
>
> Now would you trust and make your projects and yourselves dependent on
> "Pablo" and Götz? Decide for yourselves!
>
> Peter
>
> P.S. I am missing any information on NetObjects Inc. on their website
> as well.
>
>