You only have to worry about drop bears if you are an attractive female
You only have to worry about drop bears if you are an attractive female
neilruda: no, that's why I made the comment. I've been pushing responsive web design capabilities since quite a while before 2013 came out and was therefore disappointed to see they weren't in it. I'm hoping the guys are working on it now (it's a little difficult since the protocols haven't been finalised yet) and we'll see at least some of them in an upcoming release; maybe even a dot release (he said, hopefully)?
I think you can do drop shadows using CSS but haven't tried yet. I haven't played that much with 2013, simply moved a few of my sites over to see what happened and if there were any issues with them.
In your opinion, do you see enough changes, fixes, and new features to make it a worthwhile investment? I'm tired of kicking in my money, hope the next upgrade is better, only to find very little difference, or a whole new batch of bugs. If I buy NOF2013, it will be my eighth investment in the software, and really feel just a couple upgrades were worth anything.
Neil
imo yes, it's worth it for the html5 and css3 output alone. It's leaner, faster and while there are still bugs, they're being addressed by netobjects as and when they're being identified. We've already had AU1, and I don't think AU2 is that far away.
For my money, the biggest cause of application instability is windows itself which seems to get more and more bloated, complicated and unstable with every release. Windows 3.1 and NT4 were far more stable than any of the later releases - XP, Vista, 7 and 8 - have been.