Hi
I want to protect my graphcis from download how can I disable the
right-click on my pages, in general or spceficially on the graphcis? I CSS
the way to go?
regards Per
Hi
I want to protect my graphcis from download how can I disable the
right-click on my pages, in general or spceficially on the graphcis? I CSS
the way to go?
regards Per
Previuos entries in the forum, have covered this item, it appears that you
cannot protect images ect, very easily, as the viewer veiws the images on
their machines, NOF has a protect image text function, so when you right
click the image in design view, you can select the protect function, not
sure what this does exactly but it might be worth looking into.
Mike
"Per" <news-at-asset.dk> wrote in message
news:em0r0f$6dt6@flsun90netnews01.netobjects.com.. .
> Hi
>
> I want to protect my graphcis from download how can I disable the
> right-click on my pages, in general or spceficially on the graphcis? I CSS
> the way to go?
>
> regards Per
>
Hi Per,
This question comes up again and again. Why do you care if people download
your graphics? You're publishing them on the web which means your images
automatically download into the user's cache for viewing. So even if you
use a JavaScript to disable right clicking, you aren't protecting your
images because anyone can lift images in a variety of ways:
1. simple screen grabbing program
2. hitting the print scrn button on their keyboard
3. viewing your source code to find the exact location of your image files
4. viewing the browser cache files.
If you have intellectual property to protect, use low res thumbnail images
and watermark your high res images with a photo editor. Also register your
intellectual property with a service like http://www.protectrite.com/ and
place a copyright notice on your pages. That's the best you can do.
--Nancy
"Per" <news-at-asset.dk> wrote in message
news:em0r0f$6dt6@flsun90netnews01.netobjects.com.. .
> Hi
>
> I want to protect my graphcis from download how can I disable the
> right-click on my pages, in general or spceficially on the graphcis? I CSS
> the way to go?
>
> regards Per
>
>
Hi Nancy
Its a long story (as you may know) but the case is that I represent a brand
owner. I thus need a simple way of making it clear to people up front that
if the want to make a copy of these pictures they are probably not aware of
the rules regarding these matters.
In general I am all for "public domain" and "open source", but people pay me
huge sums (or at least a decent fee) to develop software and ideas for
them - and such transactions are devaluated if anyone can have a free copy
of the work I have made. Say the graphics I talk about was made by an
artist, to illustrate some training materials, and if anyone can simply copy
that it does not make much sense to pay the artist to do something unique
(if your really *want* people to copy your work, it may be a good idea to
protect it even more?)
:-) So with that in mind I share these immortal words:
What we do for ourselves dies with us. What we do for others and the world
remains and is immortal..
- Albert Pine
Regards Per
"Nancy O" <nancyoshea1@NOSPAMverizon.net> skrev i en meddelelse
news:em1hot$a2k1@flsun90netnews01.netobjects.com.. .
> Hi Per,
>
> This question comes up again and again. Why do you care if people download
> your graphics? You're publishing them on the web which means your images
> automatically download into the user's cache for viewing. So even if you
> use a JavaScript to disable right clicking, you aren't protecting your
> images because anyone can lift images in a variety of ways:
>
> 1. simple screen grabbing program
> 2. hitting the print scrn button on their keyboard
> 3. viewing your source code to find the exact location of your image files
> 4. viewing the browser cache files.
>
> If you have intellectual property to protect, use low res thumbnail images
> and watermark your high res images with a photo editor. Also register
> your
> intellectual property with a service like http://www.protectrite.com/ and
> place a copyright notice on your pages. That's the best you can do.
>
>
> --Nancy
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "Per" <news-at-asset.dk> wrote in message
> news:em0r0f$6dt6@flsun90netnews01.netobjects.com.. .
>> Hi
>>
>> I want to protect my graphcis from download how can I disable the
>> right-click on my pages, in general or spceficially on the graphcis? I
>> CSS
>> the way to go?
>>
>> regards Per
>>
>>
>
>
I think Nancy's point is not whether there is a good reason to try to
protect the images from being copied (there are many valid reasons), but
rather that it simply can't be done. For all the reasons she mentioned, if
someone wants the images...they will get them. Only the most novice user
will be stopped by a java script pop-up message. Once you post the image on
the Internet...it can be copied. The only way to make the image less
desirable to the "thieves" is to watermark it with a subtle copyright
notice. I deal with this issue for many of my clients...it's just a reality
they have to live with.
Dave
"Per" <news-at-asset.dk> wrote in message
news:em3cds$fls2@flsun90netnews01.netobjects.com.. .
> Hi Nancy
>
> Its a long story (as you may know) but the case is that I represent a
> brand owner. I thus need a simple way of making it clear to people up
> front that if the want to make a copy of these pictures they are probably
> not aware of the rules regarding these matters.
>
> In general I am all for "public domain" and "open source", but people pay
> me huge sums (or at least a decent fee) to develop software and ideas for
> them - and such transactions are devaluated if anyone can have a free copy
> of the work I have made. Say the graphics I talk about was made by an
> artist, to illustrate some training materials, and if anyone can simply
> copy that it does not make much sense to pay the artist to do something
> unique (if your really *want* people to copy your work, it may be a good
> idea to protect it even more?)
>
> :-) So with that in mind I share these immortal words:
>
> What we do for ourselves dies with us. What we do for others and the world
> remains and is immortal..
> - Albert Pine
>
> Regards Per
>
>
> "Nancy O" <nancyoshea1@NOSPAMverizon.net> skrev i en meddelelse
> news:em1hot$a2k1@flsun90netnews01.netobjects.com.. .
>> Hi Per,
>>
>> This question comes up again and again. Why do you care if people
>> download
>> your graphics? You're publishing them on the web which means your images
>> automatically download into the user's cache for viewing. So even if you
>> use a JavaScript to disable right clicking, you aren't protecting your
>> images because anyone can lift images in a variety of ways:
>>
>> 1. simple screen grabbing program
>> 2. hitting the print scrn button on their keyboard
>> 3. viewing your source code to find the exact location of your image
>> files
>> 4. viewing the browser cache files.
>>
>> If you have intellectual property to protect, use low res thumbnail
>> images
>> and watermark your high res images with a photo editor. Also register
>> your
>> intellectual property with a service like http://www.protectrite.com/
>> and
>> place a copyright notice on your pages. That's the best you can do.
>>
>>
>> --Nancy
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> "Per" <news-at-asset.dk> wrote in message
>> news:em0r0f$6dt6@flsun90netnews01.netobjects.com.. .
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> I want to protect my graphcis from download how can I disable the
>>> right-click on my pages, in general or spceficially on the graphcis? I
>>> CSS
>>> the way to go?
>>>
>>> regards Per
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
Hey Dave,
Does putting your photos in a flash gallery help protect them or are they
still easy to gain a copy of? I guess I don't know enough about stealing!
Thanks,
Shawn
"Dave@Web by Design, Inc." <dave_no@spam_wbdi.net> wrote in message
news:em42kn$ioj1@flsun90netnews01.netobjects.com.. .
> I think Nancy's point is not whether there is a good reason to try to
> protect the images from being copied (there are many valid reasons), but
> rather that it simply can't be done. For all the reasons she mentioned, if
> someone wants the images...they will get them. Only the most novice user
> will be stopped by a java script pop-up message. Once you post the image
on
> the Internet...it can be copied. The only way to make the image less
> desirable to the "thieves" is to watermark it with a subtle copyright
> notice. I deal with this issue for many of my clients...it's just a
reality
> they have to live with.
>
> Dave
>
>
> "Per" <news-at-asset.dk> wrote in message
> news:em3cds$fls2@flsun90netnews01.netobjects.com.. .
> > Hi Nancy
> >
> > Its a long story (as you may know) but the case is that I represent a
> > brand owner. I thus need a simple way of making it clear to people up
> > front that if the want to make a copy of these pictures they are
probably
> > not aware of the rules regarding these matters.
> >
> > In general I am all for "public domain" and "open source", but people
pay
> > me huge sums (or at least a decent fee) to develop software and ideas
for
> > them - and such transactions are devaluated if anyone can have a free
copy
> > of the work I have made. Say the graphics I talk about was made by an
> > artist, to illustrate some training materials, and if anyone can simply
> > copy that it does not make much sense to pay the artist to do something
> > unique (if your really *want* people to copy your work, it may be a good
> > idea to protect it even more?)
> >
> > :-) So with that in mind I share these immortal words:
> >
> > What we do for ourselves dies with us. What we do for others and the
world
> > remains and is immortal..
> > - Albert Pine
> >
> > Regards Per
> >
> >
> > "Nancy O" <nancyoshea1@NOSPAMverizon.net> skrev i en meddelelse
> > news:em1hot$a2k1@flsun90netnews01.netobjects.com.. .
> >> Hi Per,
> >>
> >> This question comes up again and again. Why do you care if people
> >> download
> >> your graphics? You're publishing them on the web which means your
images
> >> automatically download into the user's cache for viewing. So even if
you
> >> use a JavaScript to disable right clicking, you aren't protecting your
> >> images because anyone can lift images in a variety of ways:
> >>
> >> 1. simple screen grabbing program
> >> 2. hitting the print scrn button on their keyboard
> >> 3. viewing your source code to find the exact location of your image
> >> files
> >> 4. viewing the browser cache files.
> >>
> >> If you have intellectual property to protect, use low res thumbnail
> >> images
> >> and watermark your high res images with a photo editor. Also register
> >> your
> >> intellectual property with a service like http://www.protectrite.com/
> >> and
> >> place a copyright notice on your pages. That's the best you can do.
> >>
> >>
> >> --Nancy
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> "Per" <news-at-asset.dk> wrote in message
> >> news:em0r0f$6dt6@flsun90netnews01.netobjects.com.. .
> >>> Hi
> >>>
> >>> I want to protect my graphcis from download how can I disable the
> >>> right-click on my pages, in general or spceficially on the graphcis? I
> >>> CSS
> >>> the way to go?
> >>>
> >>> regards Per
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
Appart from screen dump (Print Screen) they cannot copy the flash file
images (unless someone else knows different?)
Mike C
"Shawn" <shawn@nospamtheforestryservice.com> wrote in message
news:em6tv9$s18128@flsun90netnews01.netobjects.com ...
> Hey Dave,
>
> Does putting your photos in a flash gallery help protect them or are they
> still easy to gain a copy of? I guess I don't know enough about stealing!
>
> Thanks,
>
> Shawn
>
> "Dave@Web by Design, Inc." <dave_no@spam_wbdi.net> wrote in message
> news:em42kn$ioj1@flsun90netnews01.netobjects.com.. .
>> I think Nancy's point is not whether there is a good reason to try to
>> protect the images from being copied (there are many valid reasons), but
>> rather that it simply can't be done. For all the reasons she mentioned,
>> if
>> someone wants the images...they will get them. Only the most novice user
>> will be stopped by a java script pop-up message. Once you post the image
> on
>> the Internet...it can be copied. The only way to make the image less
>> desirable to the "thieves" is to watermark it with a subtle copyright
>> notice. I deal with this issue for many of my clients...it's just a
> reality
>> they have to live with.
>>
>> Dave
>>
>>
>> "Per" <news-at-asset.dk> wrote in message
>> news:em3cds$fls2@flsun90netnews01.netobjects.com.. .
>> > Hi Nancy
>> >
>> > Its a long story (as you may know) but the case is that I represent a
>> > brand owner. I thus need a simple way of making it clear to people up
>> > front that if the want to make a copy of these pictures they are
> probably
>> > not aware of the rules regarding these matters.
>> >
>> > In general I am all for "public domain" and "open source", but people
> pay
>> > me huge sums (or at least a decent fee) to develop software and ideas
> for
>> > them - and such transactions are devaluated if anyone can have a free
> copy
>> > of the work I have made. Say the graphics I talk about was made by an
>> > artist, to illustrate some training materials, and if anyone can simply
>> > copy that it does not make much sense to pay the artist to do something
>> > unique (if your really *want* people to copy your work, it may be a
>> > good
>> > idea to protect it even more?)
>> >
>> > :-) So with that in mind I share these immortal words:
>> >
>> > What we do for ourselves dies with us. What we do for others and the
> world
>> > remains and is immortal..
>> > - Albert Pine
>> >
>> > Regards Per
>> >
>> >
>> > "Nancy O" <nancyoshea1@NOSPAMverizon.net> skrev i en meddelelse
>> > news:em1hot$a2k1@flsun90netnews01.netobjects.com.. .
>> >> Hi Per,
>> >>
>> >> This question comes up again and again. Why do you care if people
>> >> download
>> >> your graphics? You're publishing them on the web which means your
> images
>> >> automatically download into the user's cache for viewing. So even if
> you
>> >> use a JavaScript to disable right clicking, you aren't protecting your
>> >> images because anyone can lift images in a variety of ways:
>> >>
>> >> 1. simple screen grabbing program
>> >> 2. hitting the print scrn button on their keyboard
>> >> 3. viewing your source code to find the exact location of your image
>> >> files
>> >> 4. viewing the browser cache files.
>> >>
>> >> If you have intellectual property to protect, use low res thumbnail
>> >> images
>> >> and watermark your high res images with a photo editor. Also register
>> >> your
>> >> intellectual property with a service like http://www.protectrite.com/
>> >> and
>> >> place a copyright notice on your pages. That's the best you can do.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --Nancy
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> "Per" <news-at-asset.dk> wrote in message
>> >> news:em0r0f$6dt6@flsun90netnews01.netobjects.com.. .
>> >>> Hi
>> >>>
>> >>> I want to protect my graphcis from download how can I disable the
>> >>> right-click on my pages, in general or spceficially on the graphcis?
>> >>> I
>> >>> CSS
>> >>> the way to go?
>> >>>
>> >>> regards Per
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
If you have a flash decompiler it's very easy to extract images, etc. Look
here: http://www.eltima.com/products/flashdecompiler/
Short of a watermark or killing the resolution to make them
unusable/undesirable, anyone can find a way to get your images if you decide
you want to publish them on the web..... just the way it is.
the Other Chuck
"Mike C" <mike_cummings@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
news:em70ng$sja3@flsun90netnews01.netobjects.com.. .
> Appart from screen dump (Print Screen) they cannot copy the flash file
> images (unless someone else knows different?)
>
> Mike C
>
> "Shawn" <shawn@nospamtheforestryservice.com> wrote in message
> news:em6tv9$s18128@flsun90netnews01.netobjects.com ...
> > Hey Dave,
> >
> > Does putting your photos in a flash gallery help protect them or are
they
> > still easy to gain a copy of? I guess I don't know enough about
stealing!
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Shawn
> >
> > "Dave@Web by Design, Inc." <dave_no@spam_wbdi.net> wrote in message
> > news:em42kn$ioj1@flsun90netnews01.netobjects.com.. .
> >> I think Nancy's point is not whether there is a good reason to try to
> >> protect the images from being copied (there are many valid reasons),
but
> >> rather that it simply can't be done. For all the reasons she mentioned,
> >> if
> >> someone wants the images...they will get them. Only the most novice
user
> >> will be stopped by a java script pop-up message. Once you post the
image
> > on
> >> the Internet...it can be copied. The only way to make the image less
> >> desirable to the "thieves" is to watermark it with a subtle copyright
> >> notice. I deal with this issue for many of my clients...it's just a
> > reality
> >> they have to live with.
> >>
> >> Dave
> >>
> >>
> >> "Per" <news-at-asset.dk> wrote in message
> >> news:em3cds$fls2@flsun90netnews01.netobjects.com.. .
> >> > Hi Nancy
> >> >
> >> > Its a long story (as you may know) but the case is that I represent a
> >> > brand owner. I thus need a simple way of making it clear to people up
> >> > front that if the want to make a copy of these pictures they are
> > probably
> >> > not aware of the rules regarding these matters.
> >> >
> >> > In general I am all for "public domain" and "open source", but people
> > pay
> >> > me huge sums (or at least a decent fee) to develop software and ideas
> > for
> >> > them - and such transactions are devaluated if anyone can have a free
> > copy
> >> > of the work I have made. Say the graphics I talk about was made by an
> >> > artist, to illustrate some training materials, and if anyone can
simply
> >> > copy that it does not make much sense to pay the artist to do
something
> >> > unique (if your really *want* people to copy your work, it may be a
> >> > good
> >> > idea to protect it even more?)
> >> >
> >> > :-) So with that in mind I share these immortal words:
> >> >
> >> > What we do for ourselves dies with us. What we do for others and the
> > world
> >> > remains and is immortal..
> >> > - Albert Pine
> >> >
> >> > Regards Per
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > "Nancy O" <nancyoshea1@NOSPAMverizon.net> skrev i en meddelelse
> >> > news:em1hot$a2k1@flsun90netnews01.netobjects.com.. .
> >> >> Hi Per,
> >> >>
> >> >> This question comes up again and again. Why do you care if people
> >> >> download
> >> >> your graphics? You're publishing them on the web which means your
> > images
> >> >> automatically download into the user's cache for viewing. So even
if
> > you
> >> >> use a JavaScript to disable right clicking, you aren't protecting
your
> >> >> images because anyone can lift images in a variety of ways:
> >> >>
> >> >> 1. simple screen grabbing program
> >> >> 2. hitting the print scrn button on their keyboard
> >> >> 3. viewing your source code to find the exact location of your image
> >> >> files
> >> >> 4. viewing the browser cache files.
> >> >>
> >> >> If you have intellectual property to protect, use low res thumbnail
> >> >> images
> >> >> and watermark your high res images with a photo editor. Also
register
> >> >> your
> >> >> intellectual property with a service like
http://www.protectrite.com/
> >> >> and
> >> >> place a copyright notice on your pages. That's the best you can
do.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> --Nancy
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> "Per" <news-at-asset.dk> wrote in message
> >> >> news:em0r0f$6dt6@flsun90netnews01.netobjects.com.. .
> >> >>> Hi
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I want to protect my graphcis from download how can I disable the
> >> >>> right-click on my pages, in general or spceficially on the
graphcis?
> >> >>> I
> >> >>> CSS
> >> >>> the way to go?
> >> >>>
> >> >>> regards Per
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
Wow! I had no idea...
Thanks for the eye opener Chuck.
Shawn
"the other Chuck" <chuckv@NOSPAMvalentinetool.com> wrote in message
news:em75qr$t4g4@flsun90netnews01.netobjects.com.. .
> If you have a flash decompiler it's very easy to extract images, etc.
Look
> here: http://www.eltima.com/products/flashdecompiler/
> Short of a watermark or killing the resolution to make them
> unusable/undesirable, anyone can find a way to get your images if you
decide
> you want to publish them on the web..... just the way it is.
>
> the Other Chuck
>
>
>
>
>
> "Mike C" <mike_cummings@btopenworld.com> wrote in message
> news:em70ng$sja3@flsun90netnews01.netobjects.com.. .
> > Appart from screen dump (Print Screen) they cannot copy the flash file
> > images (unless someone else knows different?)
> >
> > Mike C
> >
> > "Shawn" <shawn@nospamtheforestryservice.com> wrote in message
> > news:em6tv9$s18128@flsun90netnews01.netobjects.com ...
> > > Hey Dave,
> > >
> > > Does putting your photos in a flash gallery help protect them or are
> they
> > > still easy to gain a copy of? I guess I don't know enough about
> stealing!
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Shawn
> > >
> > > "Dave@Web by Design, Inc." <dave_no@spam_wbdi.net> wrote in message
> > > news:em42kn$ioj1@flsun90netnews01.netobjects.com.. .
> > >> I think Nancy's point is not whether there is a good reason to try to
> > >> protect the images from being copied (there are many valid reasons),
> but
> > >> rather that it simply can't be done. For all the reasons she
mentioned,
> > >> if
> > >> someone wants the images...they will get them. Only the most novice
> user
> > >> will be stopped by a java script pop-up message. Once you post the
> image
> > > on
> > >> the Internet...it can be copied. The only way to make the image less
> > >> desirable to the "thieves" is to watermark it with a subtle copyright
> > >> notice. I deal with this issue for many of my clients...it's just a
> > > reality
> > >> they have to live with.
> > >>
> > >> Dave
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> "Per" <news-at-asset.dk> wrote in message
> > >> news:em3cds$fls2@flsun90netnews01.netobjects.com.. .
> > >> > Hi Nancy
> > >> >
> > >> > Its a long story (as you may know) but the case is that I represent
a
> > >> > brand owner. I thus need a simple way of making it clear to people
up
> > >> > front that if the want to make a copy of these pictures they are
> > > probably
> > >> > not aware of the rules regarding these matters.
> > >> >
> > >> > In general I am all for "public domain" and "open source", but
people
> > > pay
> > >> > me huge sums (or at least a decent fee) to develop software and
ideas
> > > for
> > >> > them - and such transactions are devaluated if anyone can have a
free
> > > copy
> > >> > of the work I have made. Say the graphics I talk about was made by
an
> > >> > artist, to illustrate some training materials, and if anyone can
> simply
> > >> > copy that it does not make much sense to pay the artist to do
> something
> > >> > unique (if your really *want* people to copy your work, it may be a
> > >> > good
> > >> > idea to protect it even more?)
> > >> >
> > >> > :-) So with that in mind I share these immortal words:
> > >> >
> > >> > What we do for ourselves dies with us. What we do for others and
the
> > > world
> > >> > remains and is immortal..
> > >> > - Albert Pine
> > >> >
> > >> > Regards Per
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > "Nancy O" <nancyoshea1@NOSPAMverizon.net> skrev i en meddelelse
> > >> > news:em1hot$a2k1@flsun90netnews01.netobjects.com.. .
> > >> >> Hi Per,
> > >> >>
> > >> >> This question comes up again and again. Why do you care if people
> > >> >> download
> > >> >> your graphics? You're publishing them on the web which means your
> > > images
> > >> >> automatically download into the user's cache for viewing. So even
> if
> > > you
> > >> >> use a JavaScript to disable right clicking, you aren't protecting
> your
> > >> >> images because anyone can lift images in a variety of ways:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> 1. simple screen grabbing program
> > >> >> 2. hitting the print scrn button on their keyboard
> > >> >> 3. viewing your source code to find the exact location of your
image
> > >> >> files
> > >> >> 4. viewing the browser cache files.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> If you have intellectual property to protect, use low res
thumbnail
> > >> >> images
> > >> >> and watermark your high res images with a photo editor. Also
> register
> > >> >> your
> > >> >> intellectual property with a service like
> http://www.protectrite.com/
> > >> >> and
> > >> >> place a copyright notice on your pages. That's the best you can
> do.
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> --Nancy
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> "Per" <news-at-asset.dk> wrote in message
> > >> >> news:em0r0f$6dt6@flsun90netnews01.netobjects.com.. .
> > >> >>> Hi
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> I want to protect my graphcis from download how can I disable the
> > >> >>> right-click on my pages, in general or spceficially on the
> graphcis?
> > >> >>> I
> > >> >>> CSS
> > >> >>> the way to go?
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> regards Per
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>