Micah Klesick \(www.learnNOF.com\)
Guest
Re: NetObjects Seepd Issues (Please run test and report back)
Mine said 20% when I started, and said 18% when I finished with the table
test.
Jeff, it might be your computer...
--
Micah Klesick
www.learnNOF.com
Flash video and PDF tutorials on
NetObjects Fusion
--
For a Forum on NOF versions 8-10 go to
www.learnNOF.com/index.php
--
"LBA" <webdesigns@no2spamabramsnet.com> wrote in message
news:fa4cno$3hp1@flsun90netnews01.netobjects.com.. .
>I certainly do agree with Gary and Micah and Nancy, since your instructions
>are so vague that they provide no basis for evaluation, but just for yucks,
>I figured I'd give it a go. I opened NOF and the performance monitor and
>closed all other apps... at which point memory usage was at 38%... and then
>I created a table... at which point memory usage was at 38%... and then I
>converted the table to a layout region... at which point memory usage was
>at 38%. Proof positive... there is no bug.
>
> Laurence
>
>
> Gary W Dumbleton wrote:
>> I agree with Micah and Nancy,
>>
>> Gary
>>
>>
>> "Jeff" <affirm@affirmware.com.au> wrote in message
>> news:fa3gkg$sgi3@flsun90netnews01.netobjects.com.. .
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > I am trying to get the net as wide as possable. This is not a controled
>> > test, its real life.
>> >
>> > Start putting constrants on it and you are not get real results.
>> >
>> > Jeff
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > "Micah Klesick (www.learnNOF.com)" <webmaster@learnNOF.com> wrote in
>> > message news:fa3ae0$sgi1@flsun90netnews01.netobjects.com.. .
>> >> Not much of a constant test that way. I would recommend doing
>> >> everything one way, as Nancy said, then how ever they nt. Otherwise
>> >> there will be no real real results.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Micah Klesick
>> >> www.learnNOF.com
>> >> Flash video and PDF tutorials on
>> >> NetObjects Fusion
>> >> --
>> >> For a Forum on NOF versions 8-10 go to
>> >> www.learnNOF.com/index.php
>> >> --
>> >>
>> >> "Jeff" <affirm@affirmware.com.au> wrote in message
>> >> news:fa2u7q$pph8@flsun90netnews01.netobjects.com.. .
>> >>> Nancy,
>> >>>
>> >>> Let people go with what they have and they report back with
>> >>> configuration.
>> >>>
>> >>> Jeff
>> >>>
>> >>> "Nancy O" <nancyoshea1@NOSPAMverizon.net> wrote in message
>> >>> news:fa2sfv$ql63@flsun90netnews01.netobjects.com.. .
>> >>>> Questions so we are all on same page:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Site settings:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> 1) Dynamic layout?
>> >>>> ... with or w/o Netscape (there's a difference)___
>> >>>>
>> >>>> 2) Fixed page layout? ___
>> >>>>
>> >>>> 3) HTML output? _____
>> >>>>
>> >>>> 4) CSS output? ____
>> >>>>
>> >>>> 5) With default MasterBorders? ____
>> >>>>
>> >>>> 6) With ZeroMargins borders? ____
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Please respond to these 6 questions before we proceed.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> --N
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> "Jeff" <affirm@affirmware.com.au> wrote in message
>> >>>> news:fa2nes$ql62@flsun90netnews01.netobjects.com.. .
>> >>>>> Hello group,
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I am creating a new thread here to see if we can isolate some of
>> >>>>> the
>> >>>>> NetObject's slow running issues. I have come up with a couple of
>> >>>>> tests for
>> >>>>> users who are using table.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Hopefully will help shed some light on the issue.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> (NOTE: make sure you create a backup before running test 2)
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Test 1.
>> >>>>> Windows XP includes a utility called Performance Monitor that will
>> >>>>> monitor
>> >>>>> just about anything your workstation does. It can be accessed by
>> >>>>> typing
>> >>>>> 'perfmon' from the Run command.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> So, in the table hit the enter about 15 time and type text then hit
>> >>>>> Alt
>> >>>> Tab
>> >>>>> to show the 'perfmon' utility and see how things are performing.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> For me it jumps up to between 85% to 100% on memory use.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I think the code inside the table function in getting itself into
>> >>>>> some
>> >>>> kind
>> >>>>> of recursive action.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Report back on your findings.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Test 2.
>> >>>>> Convert table to layout and see if the page speeds up. Then undo
>> >>>>> changes
>> >>>> so
>> >>>>> you get back to the original table.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> When converted to Layout my page speeds up normal levels.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Report back on your findings.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> Regards
>> >>>>> Jeff
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>