-
Serif Webplus x2
Has anyone seen or tried Serif Webplus x2 at all.
How does it compare for features with NOF 10
-
Re: Serif Webplus x2
I've got it, and it's good as a WYSIWYG option, however control over html is
very limited and noCSS, no chance of a dedicated CMS like N-Power (good or
bad?)
Not many templates if you work with them. Works well with Vista, embed You
tube video easily. Serif hosted forums and dynamic content to add to your
website, Good e-commerce stuff, excellent flash banners and galleries
(proper ones not NOF ones), treats text in an intelligent way, overlay text
and graphics to your hearts content and it sorts it out in publishing, but
odd way of working if you are used to NOF.
Overall good for simple, low page number websites, anything more
complicated...I don't think so.
Good luck
Graham
"JohnW" <nofng@wellbelove.co.uk> wrote in message
news:fs05o7$i8g2@flsun90netnews01.netobjects.com.. .
> Has anyone seen or tried Serif Webplus x2 at all.
> How does it compare for features with NOF 10
-
Richard Wayne Garganta
Guest
Re: Serif Webplus x2
I am surprised I don't hear more about Blumentals Web Builder 2007 - it
will train you to code the way we should have learned from the start.
All WYSIWYG editors create problems for designers and those that come
after them due to bloated and proprietary code.
A really creative WYSIWYG editor that I love playing with is DynamicHTML
Editor by Hexagora.com. This is very unique and you can do some real
nice stuff real fast if you read the help files first.
Toadie wrote:
> I've got it, and it's good as a WYSIWYG option, however control over html is
> very limited and noCSS, no chance of a dedicated CMS like N-Power (good or
> bad?)
>
> Not many templates if you work with them. Works well with Vista, embed You
> tube video easily. Serif hosted forums and dynamic content to add to your
> website, Good e-commerce stuff, excellent flash banners and galleries
> (proper ones not NOF ones), treats text in an intelligent way, overlay text
> and graphics to your hearts content and it sorts it out in publishing, but
> odd way of working if you are used to NOF.
>
> Overall good for simple, low page number websites, anything more
> complicated...I don't think so.
>
> Good luck
>
> Graham
>
>
>
> "JohnW" <nofng@wellbelove.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:fs05o7$i8g2@flsun90netnews01.netobjects.com.. .
>> Has anyone seen or tried Serif Webplus x2 at all.
>> How does it compare for features with NOF 10
>
>
-
Re: Serif Webplus x2
I've always used NOF for the site I edit (the climbing club I belong to
www.southamptonrats.org) as I've not got a lot of spare time to hand
edit HTML files.
As well as that I code in C++ as a day job so I'm not so keen to be on
the PC in the evenings too.
-
Richard Wayne Garganta
Guest
Re: Serif Webplus x2
Nice site - have you considered centering it in the window?
JohnW wrote:
> I've always used NOF for the site I edit (the climbing club I belong to
> www.southamptonrats.org) as I've not got a lot of spare time to hand
> edit HTML files.
> As well as that I code in C++ as a day job so I'm not so keen to be on
> the PC in the evenings too.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules