-
Fusion 9 memory problem!
Version 9 sucks!!! It uses ALL my memory resources and blocks my PC!!!
Ok, I have a huge site (1300 pages), but I could at least manage it with
version 8. With the new version, going from page to publish view, it takes
15 minutes and when I just change the publish settings, clicking on the
CLOSE button, it takes another 10 minutes!!!!!
A new version should be BETTER than the older one.. NOT??!!
With Fusion, this is apparently NOT the case!!
a pity..
marc
-
Re: Fusion 9 memory problem!
Marc,
not that this whould help you in your current situation but doing a site
with 1300 in NOF is just not the right thing to do. You should really think
about replacing some of your pages thru a database driven solution resulting
in tremendous reduction in size.
I whould never ever try to manage a site of this size with NOF or any other
tool. Just think about what you have to do to make sure that everything is
consistent and sound.
Instead of trying to get your site up and running in NOF9 think about a
redesign.
Nevertheless, I agree with you that NOF9 should not be worse then the former
version.
"Marc" <marc@herms.it> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:dl7en9$spl1@news01.netobjects.com...
> Version 9 sucks!!! It uses ALL my memory resources and blocks my PC!!!
>
> Ok, I have a huge site (1300 pages), but I could at least manage it with
> version 8. With the new version, going from page to publish view, it takes
> 15 minutes and when I just change the publish settings, clicking on the
> CLOSE button, it takes another 10 minutes!!!!!
>
> A new version should be BETTER than the older one.. NOT??!!
>
> With Fusion, this is apparently NOT the case!!
>
> a pity..
>
> marc
>
>
-
Re: Fusion 9 memory problem!
I am having the same problem in both NOF8 and NOF9. I have been in contact
with tech support and they assured me that the development team is going to
take a look at it. It is very frustrating to build sites when you cannot go
back and forth to page view.
"Marc" <marc@herms.it> wrote in message
news:dl7en9$spl1@news01.netobjects.com...
> Version 9 sucks!!! It uses ALL my memory resources and blocks my PC!!!
>
> Ok, I have a huge site (1300 pages), but I could at least manage it with
> version 8. With the new version, going from page to publish view, it takes
> 15 minutes and when I just change the publish settings, clicking on the
> CLOSE button, it takes another 10 minutes!!!!!
>
> A new version should be BETTER than the older one.. NOT??!!
>
> With Fusion, this is apparently NOT the case!!
>
> a pity..
>
> marc
>
>
-
Re: Fusion 9 memory problem!
"Marc" <marc@herms.it> wrote in message
news:dl7en9$spl1@news01.netobjects.com...
> Version 9 sucks!!! It uses ALL my memory resources and blocks my PC!!!
>
> Ok, I have a huge site (1300 pages), but I could at least manage it with
> version 8. With the new version, going from page to publish view, it takes
> 15 minutes and when I just change the publish settings, clicking on the
> CLOSE button, it takes another 10 minutes!!!!!
>
> A new version should be BETTER than the older one.. NOT??!!
>
> With Fusion, this is apparently NOT the case!!
>
> a pity..
>
> marc
>
>
-
Re: Fusion 9 memory problem!
On Sun, Nov 13 2005 8:27 am, "Helmuth Ritzer" <helmuth.ritzer@t-online.de> said:
>Marc,
>
>not that this whould help you in your current situation but doing a site
>with 1300 in NOF is just not the right thing to do. You should really think
>about replacing some of your pages thru a database driven solution resulting
>in tremendous reduction in size.
>
>I whould never ever try to manage a site of this size with NOF or any other
>tool. Just think about what you have to do to make sure that everything is
>consistent and sound.
>
>Instead of trying to get your site up and running in NOF9 think about a
>redesign.
>
>Nevertheless, I agree with you that NOF9 should not be worse then the former
>version.
>
>"Marc" <marc@herms.it> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
>news:dl7en9$spl1@news01.netobjects.com...
>> Version 9 sucks!!! It uses ALL my memory resources and blocks my PC!!!
>>
>> Ok, I have a huge site (1300 pages), but I could at least manage it with
>> version 8. With the new version, going from page to publish view, it takes
>> 15 minutes and when I just change the publish settings, clicking on the
>> CLOSE button, it takes another 10 minutes!!!!!
>>
>> A new version should be BETTER than the older one.. NOT??!!
>>
>> With Fusion, this is apparently NOT the case!!
>>
>> a pity..
>>
>> marc
>>
>>
>
>
I had the same problem when trying to import and work on my V 7 sites with Version 8.
That is exactly why I returned version 8 for refund.
I thank you for noting this issue and saving me the time.
For the record I have heard this suggestion that we shouldn't be using fusion
for a web site with 1000 pages before, many times, everyone always says make a
databse site.
Well, I've tried working with fusion's database and gotten really poor results.
I also think it is ridiculous to have a program with the ability to make photo
galleries, and then say not to use fusion for 1000 page sites.
Oh and by the way, there should be a warning on the netobjects site saying that
upgrading may not work with your previous netobjects sites.
Love the addition of automatic backups, my most sought after feature request,
although I am in such a habit of using export site with second copy running in
the background, I can't see blowing $200 for an auto backup, especially when my
dozens of other sites will not be usable or editable in V9 it seems.
Steve
http://www.netobjectsfusionfrustrations.blogspot.com
-
Re: Fusion 9 memory problem!
On 11/13/2005 7:25:49 AM, "Marc" wrote:
>Version 9 sucks!!! It uses ALL my memory resources and blocks my PC!!!
>
>Ok, I have a huge site (1300 pages),
> <snips>
Once you get above oh lets say, 50 pages, it's time to start redo your site with
MySQL/MS-SQL, PHP/ASP. This is not the fault of NOF, this is the fault of the
developer. A site with 1300 static pages is a mind numbingly bad idea. Heck, I
shutter to think what that would be like to load 1300 pages in my fast text
editor.
-
Re: Fusion 9 memory problem!
This has always been somewhat of a problem - Fusion's great strenghts
include such things as auto nav bar generation and a very good site
structure view, and yet once your site goes over 100 pages things can become
unstable.
If you only have a few pages, you might as well use a tool that gives you
better control over the html generated, like dreamweaver.
For a medium sized site where site structure becomes important, Fusion is
great.
But then once you get big, you're out of luck as your site is in Fusion's
proprietary format and you're stuck... you have to either live with Fusion's
instability, break up your site into lots of little sub-sites which means
each time you update the look, you have to do this many times thus becoming
somewhat of a chore, or start from scratch using other tools.
I wish WSP would focus on making Fusion able to handle large sites with ease
so Fusion users didn't have to worry about their site getting too big. A
proprietary format is fine, until you outgrow it.
Djsteve007> wrote in message news:1_84_209@gfwebforum.com...
>
> On Sun, Nov 13 2005 8:27 am, "Helmuth Ritzer" <helmuth.ritzer@t-online.de>
> said:
>>Marc,
>>
>>not that this whould help you in your current situation but doing a site
>>with 1300 in NOF is just not the right thing to do. You should really
>>think
>>about replacing some of your pages thru a database driven solution
>>resulting
>>in tremendous reduction in size.
>>
>>I whould never ever try to manage a site of this size with NOF or any
>>other
>>tool. Just think about what you have to do to make sure that everything is
>>consistent and sound.
>>
>>Instead of trying to get your site up and running in NOF9 think about a
>>redesign.
>>
>>Nevertheless, I agree with you that NOF9 should not be worse then the
>>former
>>version.
>>
>>"Marc" <marc@herms.it> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
>>news:dl7en9$spl1@news01.netobjects.com...
>>> Version 9 sucks!!! It uses ALL my memory resources and blocks my PC!!!
>>>
>>> Ok, I have a huge site (1300 pages), but I could at least manage it with
>>> version 8. With the new version, going from page to publish view, it
>>> takes
>>> 15 minutes and when I just change the publish settings, clicking on the
>>> CLOSE button, it takes another 10 minutes!!!!!
>>>
>>> A new version should be BETTER than the older one.. NOT??!!
>>>
>>> With Fusion, this is apparently NOT the case!!
>>>
>>> a pity..
>>>
>>> marc
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
> I had the same problem when trying to import and work on my V 7 sites with
> Version 8.
> That is exactly why I returned version 8 for refund.
> I thank you for noting this issue and saving me the time.
> For the record I have heard this suggestion that we shouldn't be using
> fusion
> for a web site with 1000 pages before, many times, everyone always says
> make a
> databse site.
> Well, I've tried working with fusion's database and gotten really poor
> results.
> I also think it is ridiculous to have a program with the ability to make
> photo
> galleries, and then say not to use fusion for 1000 page sites.
> Oh and by the way, there should be a warning on the netobjects site saying
> that
> upgrading may not work with your previous netobjects sites.
>
> Love the addition of automatic backups, my most sought after feature
> request,
> although I am in such a habit of using export site with second copy
> running in
> the background, I can't see blowing $200 for an auto backup, especially
> when my
> dozens of other sites will not be usable or editable in V9 it seems.
>
> Steve
> http://www.netobjectsfusionfrustrations.blogspot.com
>
>
-
Re: Fusion 9 memory problem!
I have been using NOF since MX and I have read from here already years ago,
that it is not a good idea to make huge sites only in one nof-file. Already
years ago i noticed by myself that if site goes over 500 pages, it becomes
harder to handle. I have had 800 page sites in one file.
For me this has never been an issue, because I have read it from here and
because the solution is so simple for me: I just devide big sites in to the
smaller parts, each part in their own nof-file. So if I have like 1000 page
site, I divide it to four 250 pages nof-file, of course logigally how their
content fits together. Now when I have to make changes, I only have to open
one smaller file and if I have to make changes to the master border, I have
to open 4 nof-files. Already when I start to think new site, I'm thinking
how it'll grow so I can think for how many parts I devide it.
For me this has been very simple to do.
BW
Kimmo
"Marc" <marc@herms.it> kirjoitti
viestissä:dl7en9$spl1@news01.netobjects.com...
> Version 9 sucks!!! It uses ALL my memory resources and blocks my PC!!!
>
> Ok, I have a huge site (1300 pages), but I could at least manage it with
> version 8. With the new version, going from page to publish view, it takes
> 15 minutes and when I just change the publish settings, clicking on the
> CLOSE button, it takes another 10 minutes!!!!!
>
> A new version should be BETTER than the older one.. NOT??!!
>
> With Fusion, this is apparently NOT the case!!
>
> a pity..
>
> marc
>
>
-
Re: Fusion 9 memory problem!
"Marc" <marc@herms.it> wrote in message
news:dl7en9$spl1@news01.netobjects.com...
> Version 9 sucks!!! It uses ALL my memory resources and blocks my PC!!!
>
> Ok, I have a huge site (1300 pages), but I could at least manage it with
> version 8.
I remember that the user manual for NOF 4 (yes, I've used it that long)
recommended not going over 200 pages in a single NOD file due to potential
file corruption.
I have followed your posts to this and the NOF8 newsgroup in which you
describe a 1300 + page site that was imported into ver 8 with disastrous
results then imported into ver 9 also with disastrous results because the
original NOD file was probably damaged.
I've said it before and I'm saying it again. YOUR SITE IS TOO BIG!
You must split it up into several mini sites if you are going to maintain it
in NOF. A database driven site is probably your best long-term solution.
Short term fix. Can you open your original NOD file in your earlier version
of NOF (MX or 7, I can't remember which one you were using)? If you can
still open it in that earlier version, I would use that application to split
the site into at least 10 mini sites. 130 pages is much more manageable
than 1300. Delete unused assets, optimize, export to templates, etc...
Then bring one of your small templates into the newer version of NOF and see
if it behaves.
--Nancy
-
Re: Fusion 9 memory problem!
Steve,
again, no matter if NOF supports it or not (or any other tool) the concept
as such manually maintaining a 1300+ page site is in my opinion the problem.
Think about it again, it's like writing a book in WordPad finding out it
doesn't scale and then blame MS for not having said so. Not every hammer
fits to every nail.
Of course the DB comps in NOF are not the solution either (i agree) you
really want an kind of CMS for such a tasks. That's what these guys are made
for.
Btw, there are at least ten other use cases I whould never ever use NOF for.
But the one I am using it for is worth the money for me. Simple and I don't
get frustrated ...
<Djsteve007> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:1_84_209@gfwebforum.com...
>
>
> I had the same problem when trying to import and work on my V 7 sites with
> Version 8.
> That is exactly why I returned version 8 for refund.
> I thank you for noting this issue and saving me the time.
> For the record I have heard this suggestion that we shouldn't be using
> fusion
> for a web site with 1000 pages before, many times, everyone always says
> make a
> databse site.
> Well, I've tried working with fusion's database and gotten really poor
> results.
> I also think it is ridiculous to have a program with the ability to make
> photo
> galleries, and then say not to use fusion for 1000 page sites.
> Oh and by the way, there should be a warning on the netobjects site saying
> that
> upgrading may not work with your previous netobjects sites.
>
> Love the addition of automatic backups, my most sought after feature
> request,
> although I am in such a habit of using export site with second copy
> running in
> the background, I can't see blowing $200 for an auto backup, especially
> when my
> dozens of other sites will not be usable or editable in V9 it seems.
>
> Steve
> http://www.netobjectsfusionfrustrations.blogspot.com
>
>
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules