Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 31 to 32 of 32

Thread: Image positioning

  1. #31
    LBA
    Guest

    Default Re: Image positioning

    Ted, did you happen to take a look at the above post?

    Laurence

    LBA wrote:
    Ted, 

    I'll show you a page on an active site that has a gap problem that was corrected using Lock Height on 2 text boxes.  A few days ago I converted it to NOF9 (because for some reason, NOF8 would crash everytime I tried to publish this, and only this site.)  The gap problem and the fix using Lock Height were identical in NOF8 and NOF9. 

    Here is the fixed page...
    http://www.cleokatz.com/html/about.html

    ....and here is the identical page with Lock Height turned off in the two large text areas...
    http://www.cleokatz.com/html/about2.html

    Notice the larger gap below the top portion of text (before "What People Are Saying") and the larger white space at the bottom of the page.

    Below is an image of the page in Page View, so you can see what page elements are being used...

    Laurence





    Ted wrote: Graeme & Laurence,

    I'd be interested in seeing any before & after html code that you might have to highlight this. I'm specifically interested in how the 'height' parameter, which is deprecated, is handled.

    Regards
    Ted


    Graeme Davidson wrote:

    "LBA" <webdesigns@no2spamabramsnet.com> wrote in message news:do2evg$mag5@news01.netobjects.com...



    Yes, the Lock Height fix (and the underlying problem to which it addresses) is something that only popped up recently. I never had the problem in previous versions of NOF, but beginning I think with version 8, I began to see it... and I began to use Lock Height as a fix. I don't know if WSP will address this anytime soon... but I sure hope they do. Laurence



    Hi Laurence, That's interesting and worrying in that the issue has survived over two releases of NOF. I'll mention that too in my reply to NOF support - I really hope they address it too!


  2. #32
    Ted
    Guest

    Default Re: Image positioning

    Hi Laurence,

    I did and forgive the silence but I've been rather busy in the analogue.
    I was looking for a logical pattern to see if the resultant html had any
    hint as to the processing error but I couldn't find enough to be
    specific. My view is that the issue is related to how NOF processes the
    NOD file. I and others, have noticed how a small change can produce an
    out of proportion change in the html.

    This is an issue which has been in NOF since year dot and, in my
    opinion, {based on reading the SEC documents, WSP's attitude, and the
    fact that WSP does not, to any meaningful degree, 'eat it's own dog
    food'} it's here to stay.

    Sorry not to be more help, though at least you have identified a workaround.

    Regards
    Ted



    LBA wrote:

    > Ted, did you happen to take a look at the above post?
    >
    > Laurence
    >
    > LBA wrote:
    >
    >> Ted,
    >>
    >> I'll show you a page on an active site that has a gap problem that
    >> was corrected using Lock Height on 2 text boxes. A few days ago I
    >> converted it to NOF9 (because for some reason, NOF8 would crash
    >> everytime I tried to publish this, and only this site.) The gap
    >> problem and the fix using Lock Height were identical in NOF8 and NOF9.
    >>
    >> Here is the fixed page...
    >> http://www.cleokatz.com/html/about.html
    >>
    >> ....and here is the identical page with Lock Height turned off in the
    >> two large text areas...
    >> http://www.cleokatz.com/html/about2.html
    >>
    >> Notice the larger gap below the top portion of text (before "What
    >> People Are Saying") and the larger white space at the bottom of the page.
    >>
    >> Below is an image of the page in Page View, so you can see what page
    >> elements are being used...
    >>
    >> Laurence
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> Ted wrote:
    >>
    >>> Graeme & Laurence,
    >>>
    >>> I'd be interested in seeing any before & after html code that you
    >>> might have to highlight this. I'm specifically interested in how the
    >>> 'height' parameter, which is deprecated, is handled.
    >>>
    >>> Regards
    >>> Ted
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> Graeme Davidson wrote:
    >>>
    >>>>"LBA" <webdesigns@no2spamabramsnet.com> wrote in message
    >>>>news:do2evg$mag5@news01.netobjects.com...
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>>Yes, the Lock Height fix (and the underlying problem to which it
    >>>>>addresses) is something that only popped up recently. I never had the
    >>>>>problem in previous versions of NOF, but beginning I think with version 8,
    >>>>>I began to see it... and I began to use Lock Height as a fix. I don't
    >>>>>know if WSP will address this anytime soon... but I sure hope they do.
    >>>>>
    >>>>>Laurence
    >>>>>
    >>>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>Hi Laurence,
    >>>>
    >>>>That's interesting and worrying in that the issue has survived over two
    >>>>releases of NOF. I'll mention that too in my reply to NOF support - I really
    >>>>hope they address it too!
    >>>>
    >>>>
    >>>>



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •