To continue your car comparison. No, there is no guarantee but I'm sure the
individual components will still function as those of the original!!!!!!

Mick (I only want what I brought to work)

"Gary W Dumbleton" <gary@gwd.net> wrote in message
news:ekmihu$4hc5@flsun90netnews01.netobjects.com.. .
> Hi Mike,
>
> If you bought a new car, is there any guarantee that the new one will
> perform as trouble free as the old one?
>
> I think this is very subjective.
>
> NOF 10 is quite a change from NOF 9.1, with many new features, many new
> ways to do things, complete redo of the user interface, new flash
> components, new flash photo gallery, complete control over css and lots
> more. I would guess that with the addition of all of the new features,
> while keeping compatibility with old features and the integration of all
> of these, there is always a chance that there will be bugs. (This is not
> reserved for NOF or WSP, why do you think that Microsoft puts out weekly
> updates to Windows and I bet no-one will be guaranteeing that Vista will
> be as good or better than XP - another topic)
>
> I do not know whether you have been observing WSP lately. I sure have,
> both as a user and as a beta tester, and they seem to be very dedicated to
> the development of NOF. One big step was that NOF now generates valid
> code, a very large step for NOF.
>
> With the major changes in this version, I am sure, will come some bugs,
> but rest assured that WSP will be on top of it by releasing updates in a
> timely fashion.
>
> I have never felt so good about NOF.
>
> The development team, is very serious about producing a problem free, full
> featured, website development tool, the beta testers are working very hard
> to identify and duplicate possible bugs, WPS is also working hard to
> remedy any bugs that have been found.
>
> Guarantee no! but hard work and dedication to attain a state of the art
> development tool, I would say so.
>
> Just my 2 cents worth.
>
> Gary
>
>
>
>
> "Mick Pattison" <mick.pattison@tiscali.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:ekmhba$3s67@flsun90netnews01.netobjects.com.. .
>> OK, there may be a conflict between development and fixes but they broke
>> it on two counts through the release of 9.0 and the 9.1 fix. As a
>> customer who purchased the software (NOF 9.0) surely I am entitled to a
>> product that works the same as the previously installed (NOF 8.0), or to
>> put it another way fixes should correct errors in the bells and whistles
>> of 9.0 and not what was broken by the implementation of the upgrade. What
>> guarantee have I got that if I upgraded my system so that NOF 10 can be
>> installed it will work as NOF 8 did or NOF 9.0/9.1 should have.
>>
>> Mick
>>
>> "Allison Moore" <dumpALLISONlowercase@forgetMETAthisHEALTHand.CO M> wrote
>> in message news:A921.1164839700.1001@gfwebforum.com...
>>>> but please can we fix what's broken before adding more bells and
>>>> whistles. Thanks
>>>
>>> This has been my plea for every app I've ever used, not just NOF. :-) To
>>> date, it's gone largely unheeded.
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, people don't pay for bug fixes (or at least they don't
>>> want to). And reviewers and pundits don't care about bug fixes. They
>>> only care about bells & whistles. Nevertheless, it costs a lot of time
>>> and money to fix things. I know -- I work for a software company.)
>>> There's a constant push-pull between fixes and new development, between
>>> the need to clean up your messes and the need to pay your employees.
>>>
>>> Am I letting Website Pros off the hook? Absolutely not. But it helps to
>>> bait the hook with a little compassion and understanding. :-)
>>>
>>> Allison
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>